Renegade-Hamster's movie Reviews on Newgrounds

[Burnt Face Man 6]

Well done, David

This is your bizarre sense of humour displayed at it's best. It shows great improvement on the last BFM toon (BFM 5). This is up there with the first couple you made in this series. Keep it up.

4/5

[Sonic: RMC EP.1]

Remember Simba, we are part of a circle...

Ha! Interesting choice of music. Some good animation, although I think there should be more stuff happening on screen when they are talking. It gets boring when the picture is still, and you have to read.

3/5

[Tales of Interest V]

Annoying and juvenile

Sometimes that's a winning combination, but not in this case. The voices are too loud, the story is boring, the jokes are not funny. The graphics are simple, but not an eyesore. The animation is alright.

Work on your writing, and the rest of the thing might be enjoyable.

1/5

[Peoplemation: Trash]

Good people-mation and music

Hahaha! You had blue hair! Hahahahahahaha!

3/5 (almost a 4)

[Neighboring Nations]

Hooray! More Peter Godly

Nerdy, nuts, and completely dangerous.

What's funny is that while he can take certain passages from the Old Testament out of context and create destruction, he forgets that Jesus said "Turn the other cheek".

Perhaps his Bible misprinted that verse and instead Jesus says "Kill those who make fun of your faith."

That "Abstinence Rocks!" CD made me crack a rib.

:D

Thanks from another (not insane) christian fan.

4/5

[The Chicken or the egg!]

Funny toon! I enjoyed this.

Good graphics and animation. That bit where the narrator drones on for a while got annoying, but overall I liked it.

You have some flawed information, though.

Between man and the chimpanzee (not gorillas, as you have depicted) there is 4% difference in genetic make-up (not 1%, as you have stated). But that equals 125 million DNA differences. The difference that means chimps will stay chimps, but human babies will learn language and higher thinking skills.

The figures no more say chimpanzees are 96% human, than we are 50% banana (with which we share 50% of the same DNA).

Neither is there such a convenient line-up of ape-to-human fossils in the fossil record. You find apes (Australopithecus) and humans (Neanderthals, Cro-Magnon, Sapiens), but no "ape-men".

I believe what the Bible says about our creation. Genesis tell us that God created creatures to reproduce after their own "kind" (not necessarily "species" in the contemporary scientific sense).

So, I would have to say that the Chicken came before the Egg. If the Egg came first, it would reproduce after it's own kind according to God's word (creating more eggs).

It's funny how such a basic, yet enduring, question shows where our pressuppositions come from.

You believe evolution, so you say the egg came first (layed by a closely related "non-chicken"). I believe God's Word, so I say the chicken came first.

3/5

whataboffin responds:

Im glad you enjoyed my film I knew from the start that the percentage thing was really right but i never intended it to be too scientifically accurate. QI on the telly a while ago said we were 2% different so it seems there are lots of different ideas on how different we all are.

[Project I.V.]

Awesome, Krinkels

I was waiting for you to finish this so you could go back to making Madness... but this so much better. Very, very well done.

5/5

[<3 from the GG]

Ha!

MrKickyourbutt wrote:
"Your link doesn't even work."

Fafara responded thusly:
"Read the authors comments, bihotch."

CAN YOU FEEL THE LOVE?!!

Granted, MrKickyourbutt is an idiot for complaining about something explained in the author's comments, but calling him a "bihotch" certainly isn't a loving thing to do.

:D

The Glock Group's new facade of being a happy group full of "nice people" that love each other has been revealed to be bull in the first couple of minutes.

PlexityMusic responds:

Personal stuff.